Ebook In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III
Simply for you today! Discover your preferred e-book here by downloading as well as getting the soft file of guide In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III This is not your time to typically likely to guide shops to get an e-book. Right here, ranges of e-book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III as well as collections are offered to download and install. Among them is this In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III as your favored e-book. Obtaining this publication In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III by on the internet in this site can be understood now by seeing the web link page to download. It will certainly be easy. Why should be right here?
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III
Ebook In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III
Book enthusiasts, when you require a new book to review, discover the book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III below. Never worry not to discover exactly what you need. Is the In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III your needed book currently? That's true; you are truly an excellent viewers. This is an excellent book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III that comes from excellent author to share with you. Guide In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III provides the best experience and lesson to take, not only take, yet likewise discover.
The means to obtain this book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III is quite simple. You might not go for some areas and invest the moment to only find guide In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III Actually, you might not constantly obtain the book as you're willing. However right here, just by search as well as discover In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III, you could get the listings of guides that you truly expect. In some cases, there are many publications that are revealed. Those publications obviously will surprise you as this In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III compilation.
Are you interested in mainly publications In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III If you are still confused on which of the book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III that ought to be acquired, it is your time to not this site to search for. Today, you will need this In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III as one of the most referred book as well as most required publication as resources, in other time, you could enjoy for a few other books. It will depend on your prepared demands. Yet, we consistently recommend that publications In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III can be a great problem for your life.
Also we discuss guides In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III; you might not find the printed publications below. So many collections are provided in soft data. It will exactly give you a lot more perks. Why? The initial is that you might not need to carry the book almost everywhere by satisfying the bag with this In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III It is for the book is in soft file, so you can save it in gadget. After that, you could open up the gizmo all over and review guide appropriately. Those are some couple of benefits that can be obtained. So, take all advantages of getting this soft data book In Defense Of Elitism, By William A. Henry III in this internet site by downloading in web link supplied.
From the Pulitzer Prize-winning culture critic for Time magazine comes the tremendously controversial, yet highly persuasive, argument that our devotion to the largely unexamined myth of egalitarianism lies at the heart of the ongoing "dumbing of America."
Americans have always stubbornly clung to the myth of egalitarianism, of the supremacy of the individual average man. But here, at long last, Pulitzer Prize-winning critic William A. Henry III takes on, and debunks, some basic, fundamentally ingrained ideas: that everyone is pretty much alike (and should be); that self-fulfillment is more imortant thant objective achievement; that everyone has something significant to contribute; that all cultures offer something equally worthwhile; that a truly just society would automatically produce equal success results across lines of race, class, and gender; and that the common man is almost always right. Henry makes clear, in a book full of vivid examples and unflinching opinions, that while these notions are seductively democratic they are also hopelessly wrong.
- Sales Rank: #647437 in Books
- Brand: William A Henry
- Published on: 1995-08-01
- Released on: 1995-08-01
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.00" h x .50" w x 5.20" l, .40 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 212 pages
- In defense of elitism
From Publishers Weekly
Pulitzer Prize-winning cultural critic Henry debunks ideas of inherent equality, arguing that not all achievements are the same.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
The late Henry (he recently died of a heart attack) was a Pulitzer Prize-winning culture critic for Time and a self-described white, Yale-educated, suburban, registered Democrat. One guesses he spent his youth being a liberal but, judging from this book, became another neoconservative in middle age because of the excesses of affirmative action, feminism, multiculturalism, etc. What the United States needs now, argues Henry, is elitism, which he never defines but which seems to mean a social system that rewards only competence, not skin color, gender, disability, etc. Henry never seems to appreciate fully how much talent was going unrewarded before affirmative action, feminism, etc., or that any human activity, no matter how worthy, is liable to silly or dangerous excesses. Unfortunately, this book may attract the attention of reactionaries like Henry, so academic and public libraries should consider it for purchase.
--Jeffrey R. Herold, Bucyrus P.L., Ohio
Copyright 1994 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Kirkus Reviews
A liberal tries to straddle the fence, in a harsh, often trite polemic geared to enrage multiculturalists, feminists, affirmative activists, and others. Even liberals who secretly harbor doubts about whether a lack of ethnic pride is what underlies the difficulties of black children in school will find little succor from Henry (a Pulitzer Prize winner and a columnist for Time who died this summer at the age of 44). Even those who criticize the belief that all values and ideas are equally worthy will be offended by his writing, regarding the relative worth of cultures, ``It is scarcely the same thing to put a man on the moon as to put a bone in your nose.'' In defending elitism as an individualist philosophy that demands the best from each person and rewards those with the greatest achievements, Henry slaughters every sacred cow of the left. Affirmative action, he claims, is as unfair to its beneficiaries as it is to white men, breeding doubt in minority employees whether they were hired for their abilities or to fill a quota. As for feminism, ``forty-six percent of the nation's financial managers are women,'' so what are they still griping about, he wonders. Educated mothers should stay home: ``A live-in nanny clearly represents an intellectual step down for the child,'' since she is probably not college-educated. (But even card-carrying feminists will relish his quotes from some rather laughable scholarly feminist works, for instance, one about the impact of ``masculinism'' on the study of geography.) The gaps in Henry's logic are often glaring. He believes in equality of opportunity rather than equality of outcome, but he wants less academically successful students to be tracked into vocational education at an early age. And in espousing Oregon's health-care reform package--which even the Bush administration rejected as discriminatory against the disabled--on the grounds that some lives are more valuable to society than others, Henry begs the whole question of the worth of human life. An infuriating screed that will alienate even those liberals seeking a coherent and well-argued defense of intellectual rigor and reward for merit. -- Copyright ©1994, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved.
Most helpful customer reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
Even more relevant today
By Brian E. Wright
It’s been twenty-plus years since this book was written, and each of Henry’s examples could easily be updated with current (and more extreme) examples of the American leveling phenomenon. He suggests that this trend began after WWII, but one can look back to the early 1800’s when Alexis de Tocqueville identified extreme egalitarianism as the overarching ethos explaining much of the American character.
Consider these observations from Vol. 1 of Democracy in America:
“There is, in fact, a manly and lawful passion for equality that incites men to wish all to be powerful and honored. This passion tends to elevate the humble to the rank of the great; but there exists also in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to attempt to lower the powerful to their own level and reduces men to prefer equality in slavery to inequality with freedom. Not that those nations whose social condition is democratic naturally despise liberty; on the contrary, they have an instinctive love of it. But liberty is not the chief and constant object of their desires; equality is their idol: they make rapid and sudden efforts to obtain liberty and, if they miss their aim, resign themselves to their disappointment; but nothing can satisfy them without equality, and they would rather perish than lose it.“
…And from Vol. II:
“Political liberty bestows exalted pleasures from time to time upon a certain number of citizens. Equality every day confers a number of small enjoyments on every man. The charms of equality are every instant felt and are within the reach of all; the noblest hearts are not insensible to them, and the most vulgar souls exult in them. The passion that equality creates must therefore be at once strong and general. Men cannot enjoy political liberty unpurchased by some sacrifices, and they never obtain it without great exertions. But the pleasures of equality are self-proffered; each of the petty incidents of life seems to occasion them, and in order to taste them, nothing is required but to live."
"I think that democratic communities have a natural taste for freedom; left to themselves, they will seek it, cherish it, and view any privation of it with regret. But for equality their passion is ardent, insatiable, incessant, invincible; they call for equality in freedom; and if they cannot obtain that, they still call for equality in slavery. They will endure poverty, servitude, barbarism, but they will not endure aristocracy."
"This is true at all times, and especially in our own day. All men and all powers seeking to cope with this irresistible passion will be overthrown and destroyed by it. In our age freedom cannot be established without it, and despotism itself cannot reign without its support.”
In Defense of Elitism is a thoughtful and engaging reflection on what may be the inevitable development of democratic egalitarianism.
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
In defense of common sense
By Fermi's Paradox
I don't know a single person that doesn't wonder and even worry WHY there is such variation among life outcomes, particularly economic. This is the book for you. Perhaps not because of it's style, assertions or recommendations, but because it will really cause you to think and investigate deeper into this most important topic.
I mention economic because there is general comfort with those who succeed in music, entertainment, art, athletics, literature and even ideas. We rarely begrudge their success or somehow believe it was ill-gotten or at the expense of others. But when it comes to economic success, it is altogether different. Society in general seems to be enraged despite the overwhelming evidence that the competition to succeed economically is by and large no different than other walks of life. I find it very interesting how people praise the lottery winner in virtually every way but will find all manner of illegitimacy in wealth acquired through business endeavors. Perhaps it is because it is so much easier to recognize the elite in these other areas - we know when we see superior talent on stage or on the court. Henry's book will help you think much deeper in this area.
My only complaint about the book and it is perhaps a big one, is that Henry doesn't direct the reader to the mountain of other work and evidence that supports his claims. There is a wealth of information out there on this subject. So the book is largely narrative (as is this review, but I encourage you to use your search engine). If you come to reading it with a predisposition that supports his views you will like it, if you come with a view in opposition, Henry will likely not change your mind. But do your own research this book provokes.
Talent, drive, willingness to work very hard and take risk are attributes that simply are not uniformly distributed among people. And environment will not change that fact very much. And we all benefit from the successful. All these facts are contentious and may be hard to accept. The facts are neither good nor bad, they just are.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
Surprisingly shocked to read a modern day Democrat speak out ...
By Daniel Lyle
Surprisingly shocked to read a modern day Democrat speak out against the demeaning and degrading effects of egalitarianism that so many in his party have overlooked in the modern euphoria surrounding egalitarianism. While he is definitely more liberal than a conservative or libertarian, it is refreshing to know that elitists, that is those who believe in the allowing people to both succeed and fail a well as rise to the level they can and want to attain, have still existed in both major political parties even if their numbers have dwindled.
For a more libertarian view on the vanities of egalitarianism read Murray Rothbards essays in "Egalitarianism, a Revolt against Nature".
The one point that I remember disagreeing with William A Henry on was his support of establishing equality of opportunity. I believe in equality in terms of the law being applied as equally as possible, but equality of opportunity seems a dangerous slippery slope to advocate. Sure I want everyone to have opportunities and succeed, but when we as a society try to level the playing field for one little thing in order to try to create more equal opportunity, how do we know when to stop? It becomes a heap problem in philosophical terms: when does another grain of the sands of egalitarianism become a heap that really marks the promotion of equality of outcomes? I don't think Wiiliam a Henry argued against this danger. Yet he does argue strongly against egalitarianism and the resulting sickness of obsessing over equality of outcomes in all walks of life from workplace salaries and hiring practices to education and sports.
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III PDF
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III EPub
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III Doc
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III iBooks
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III rtf
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III Mobipocket
In Defense of Elitism, by William A. Henry III Kindle
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar